Thank God Trump Brokered a Ceasefire. That’s the Last Thing Mark Levin Wanted.

In this podcast episode, Clayton Morris, a former Fox News host and media insider, reflects on his decade-long experience in cable news and the broader media landscape’s role in shaping public opinion, particularly regarding war and foreign policy. Morris, who left Fox News voluntarily in 2017 after a 10-year tenure, shares his frustrations and insights about the media’s complicity in promoting war narratives, the military-industrial complex’s influence, and the erosion of genuine journalism. The discussion touches on the recent conflict involving Iran, the media’s reaction to Trump’s military actions, and the parallels with the lead-up to the Iraq War in the early 2000s.

Media’s Role in War Propaganda

Morris opens by describing how the media, including Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC, have historically followed a “playbook” when pushing the public toward war. He recalls the 2002-2003 Iraq War buildup, where cable news operated in near lockstep, overwhelmingly promoting pro-war voices and marginalizing dissent. He highlights the explicit booking strategies, such as MSNBC’s two-for-one ratio favoring pro-war guests, and the absence of meaningful debate or critical questioning on these networks. This pattern, he argues, is repeated today in the coverage of Iran, where the media uniformly praises Trump’s military strikes and demonizes any opposition as unpatriotic or pro-terrorist.

Morris emphasizes that this is not accidental but a deliberate, profitable strategy. Cable news thrives on war coverage, which dramatically boosts ratings and ad revenue. He cites data from 2002 showing a 150% revenue increase for Fox News during the Iraq War buildup, underscoring the financial incentives behind the media’s war drumbeat.

Personal Experiences and Challenges in Cable News

Morris shares his personal journey, explaining why he left Fox News despite being offered his own show. The grueling schedule, the toxic environment of personal attacks, and the inability to spend time with his family contributed to his decision. He also recounts the subtle but powerful editorial guidance that shaped what topics could be discussed and how. While no one explicitly told him what to say, the prepared segments and the overall agenda left little room for genuine inquiry, especially on sensitive issues like the military-industrial complex’s vast budget or the actual effectiveness of military strikes.

He recalls instances where questioning the official narrative was discouraged or punished, such as the firing of Judge Andrew Napolitano after he voiced anti-war views. Morris also describes the internal conflicts he faced when trying to raise inconvenient truths, like the questionable justification for the Iraq War or the dubious nature of chemical attack claims in Syria.

The Military-Industrial Complex and Foreign Policy Critique

A significant portion of the conversation focuses on the military-industrial complex’s pervasive influence on U.S. foreign policy and media coverage. Morris points out how defense contractors like Boeing and Northrop Grumman have factories in nearly every congressional district, creating a web of financial interests that incentivize perpetual war. This system, he argues, stifles dissent and critical examination of military actions.

He also critiques the uncritical support for Israel within U.S. politics and media, noting the disproportionate attention and resources devoted to Israeli interests at the expense of addressing pressing domestic issues like homelessness and drug addiction. Morris expresses frustration with American politicians who openly prioritize foreign interests, citing Ted Cruz’s admission that serving Israel was a primary motivation for his political career. This, he warns, fuels radicalization and undermines national unity.

The Current Iran Conflict and Media Coverage

Turning to recent events, Morris discusses the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites authorized by former President Trump. He is critical of the media’s breathless and uncritical celebration of these attacks, which he sees as a replay of the 2002 Iraq War propaganda. He highlights the lack of skepticism about the actual damage inflicted, noting reports that some targeted sites were already empty or previously struck by Israel.

Morris also calls out Fox News personalities like Mark Levin and Barry Weiss for their alarmist rhetoric, which he views as fearmongering designed to rally support for further military escalation. He contrasts this with the absence of dissenting voices on these networks, pointing out that those who question the narrative are often marginalized or fired.

The Decline of Cable News and Changing Media Landscape

Both Morris and Carlson agree that traditional cable news is in decline, with its aging audience and shrinking influence. Younger generations consume news through social media platforms like TikTok, YouTube, and X, bypassing cable altogether. Morris notes that the era of high-paid cable news personalities and mass cable subscriptions is ending, and the industry must adapt or face obsolescence.

Broader Social and Cultural Observations

Beyond foreign policy, Morris touches on broader societal issues, including the decline of American cities, the erosion of family structures, and cultural shifts that he finds troubling. He laments the state of major urban centers like New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco, which he sees as emblematic of America’s deeper problems. He also criticizes the cultural messaging that undermines traditional family values and promotes division.

Reflections on Trump, Fox News, and Political Dynamics

Morris offers a nuanced view of Donald Trump, expressing personal frustration but also genuine support. He reveals that the Murdoch family, which owns Fox News, deeply dislikes Trump and even encouraged Morris to run for president to oppose him after Morris left the network. He describes the complex relationship between Trump and Fox News, where some hosts like Sean Hannity support Trump, while others, including Jennifer Griffin, are openly hostile.

He also discusses the performative nature of some Fox News personalities who publicly praise Trump while privately opposing him, creating a confusing and often contradictory media environment.

Conclusion: The Need for Truth and Accountability

Throughout the conversation, Morris stresses the importance of truth, critical thinking, and accountability in media and politics. He warns against the dangers of flattery and groupthink, urging individuals to seek honest information and question prevailing narratives. He expresses hope that as the media landscape evolves, there will be more space for genuine debate and less manipulation by entrenched interests.

Morris’s reflections serve as a sobering reminder of the media’s power to shape public perception and the urgent need for a more transparent and responsible press, especially in matters of war and peace.

Videos

Full episode

Episode summary