BREAKING: Tucker and Doug Macgregor React to Proposed Ceasefire Deal Between Ukraine and Russia

The Current State of the Conflict

Macgregor expressed a sense of foreboding about the future, suggesting that the world is on the brink of a catastrophic event, potentially a global war. He highlighted a recent drone attack on Moscow attributed to Ukraine, which resulted in casualties among Russian civilians. This incident raised questions about the motivations behind such actions and the broader implications for the conflict.

Macgregor argued that the Russians perceive the U.S. as sincere in its desire to end the conflict, particularly under the leadership of Donald Trump. However, he criticized the U.S. for not taking decisive action to remove Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and his government, which he described as a "rogue organization." He pointed out that the Russians are organized and disciplined, capable of stopping their military actions when it suits their strategic interests, while the Ukrainians appear to be acting out of desperation.

Concerns Over Ukrainian Actions

The discussion turned to the Ukrainian military's actions, with Macgregor suggesting that they have resorted to acts of vengeance as they face defeat. He characterized these actions as attempts to inflict harm on Russia and create an illusion of hope for Ukrainian forces. He expressed skepticism about Ukraine's ability to mobilize more manpower, arguing that they are scraping the bottom of the barrel in terms of resources.

Macgregor also raised concerns about the safety of President Trump, suggesting that the Ukrainian government and its supporters have shown a willingness to resort to violence against critics. He referenced the recent assassination of a critic of Ukraine, implying that such actions could pose a threat to American leaders as well.

The Russian Perspective

Macgregor provided insight into the Russian military's strategic position, asserting that they currently hold the initiative in the conflict. He speculated that the Russians may be contemplating further military actions, including advancing into Kyiv and securing more territory in Ukraine. He emphasized that the Russian leadership, particularly President Putin, is calculated and judicious, weighing their options carefully.

He noted that while the Russians have historically not sought to expand their territory aggressively, the ongoing conflict has pushed them to consider securing more land to ensure their national security. Macgregor suggested that the recent Ukrainian attacks could convince Russian leaders to take more decisive military action.

The Ceasefire Proposal

The conversation shifted to the proposed ceasefire deal between Ukraine and Russia, which Macgregor viewed with skepticism. He argued that the U.S. and Ukraine cannot expect Russia to agree to a ceasefire while continuing to supply Ukraine with military aid. He emphasized that the responsibility lies with Ukraine to demonstrate a willingness to cease hostilities before any meaningful negotiations can occur.

Macgregor criticized the notion that the U.S. could broker peace while simultaneously supporting Ukraine's military efforts. He argued that the U.S. has created a "monster" in Ukraine by providing military support, and now it must take responsibility for the consequences of that support.

The Role of Europe and Germany

The discussion also touched on the broader European context, particularly Germany's role in the conflict. Macgregor expressed concern about the current German leadership, suggesting that they are not adequately addressing the challenges facing the country. He argued that Germany needs to return to its roots and focus on its strengths, rather than apologizing for its past.

Macgregor highlighted the importance of Germany in Europe, asserting that without a strong and productive Germany, Europe risks becoming stagnant. He called for a return to a more rigorous educational system in Germany, emphasizing the need for a focus on knowledge and understanding rather than the current trend of self-loathing and guilt.

The Future of U.S. Foreign Policy

As the conversation progressed, Macgregor articulated a vision for U.S. foreign policy that prioritizes national interests and disengagement from unnecessary conflicts. He argued that the U.S. should not be involved in wars that do not serve its interests and should instead focus on securing its borders and addressing domestic issues.

Macgregor expressed a desire for President Trump to take a strong stance against military interventions, advocating for a return to a more isolationist approach that emphasizes American sovereignty and security. He suggested that the U.S. should end military aid to Ukraine and withdraw its personnel, allowing Europe to take the lead in resolving the conflict.