Added: Oct 3, 2024
In this podcast episode, Ben Shapiro provides an analysis of the vice presidential debate between JD Vance, the Republican candidate, and Tim Walz, the Democratic candidate. Shapiro praises Vance's performance, highlighting his ability to articulate his points clearly and effectively while countering Walz's arguments. The discussion covers various topics, including foreign policy, immigration, the economy, abortion, and the overarching theme of government involvement.
JD Vance's Stellar Performance
Shapiro opens the podcast by emphasizing the high expectations surrounding JD Vance's debate performance, particularly given the chaotic reputation of the Trump campaign. Vance, according to Shapiro, exceeded these expectations, delivering one of the best Republican debate performances of the century. He effectively positioned himself as a rational and competent candidate, countering the narrative that the Trump-Vance ticket represents chaos. Shapiro notes that Vance's calm demeanor and high intelligence allowed him to disarm attacks from Walz and the moderators, particularly Margaret Brennan, who he criticizes for her biased questioning.
Foreign Policy and the Middle East
The debate began with a discussion on the Middle East, particularly the recent missile attacks from Iran on Israel. Walz attempted to credit Kamala Harris for stability in the region, but Vance countered by pointing out that the chaos stemmed from the Biden administration's policies, which had emboldened Iran. Vance articulated that Trump's administration had established effective deterrence, leading to greater stability. He argued that the current administration's actions had directly contributed to the ongoing conflict, emphasizing the need for a strong U.S. presence in global affairs.
Immigration Crisis
The debate shifted to immigration, where Vance highlighted the disastrous consequences of Harris's policies, which he claimed had opened the floodgates for illegal immigration. He pointed out the dangers posed by fentanyl entering the U.S. and the loss of thousands of children by the Department of Homeland Security. Vance's argument was that the real family separation issue was the result of the current administration's failure to secure the border. In contrast, Walz struggled to defend Harris's record, leading to a clear win for Vance in this segment.
Economic Policies
As the debate progressed to economic issues, Shapiro expresses frustration with both candidates' lack of commitment to free-market principles. Vance criticized Walz for proposing large government spending initiatives without addressing the underlying issues that drive up costs. He pointed out that while Walz made grand promises, he had failed to deliver on them during his time in office. Vance's critique was effective, but Shapiro laments the absence of a strong defense of free-market economics from either candidate.
The Abortion Debate
The discussion on abortion proved to be a challenging topic for Vance. While he attempted to empathize with women facing unplanned pregnancies, Shapiro notes that Vance's approach risked diluting the pro-life message. Vance shared a personal story to illustrate the complexities surrounding the issue, but Shapiro argues that he missed an opportunity to firmly assert the pro-life position. Instead of framing the debate around the protection of life, Vance's narrative focused more on understanding women's choices, which could be misinterpreted as a more moderate stance.
The January 6th Controversy
Towards the end of the debate, the topic of January 6th arose, where Vance found himself in a difficult position due to Trump's refusal to acknowledge his electoral loss. Shapiro points out that while Vance made valid points about the threats to democracy posed by censorship and big tech, he was still forced to navigate the politically charged waters of the 2020 election. Walz seized the opportunity to attack Vance on this front, questioning the integrity of Trump's actions and the implications for democracy.
Related episodes
