The COLLAPSE Of The Elitists

Added: Nov 21, 2024

The Nature of Meritocracy

Shapiro begins by exploring the concept of meritocracy, which traditionally suggests that individuals rise to positions of power based on their abilities and achievements. He argues that the current political climate reflects a departure from true meritocracy, as many individuals in power are not necessarily the most qualified but rather part of a self-appointed elite. This elite, according to Shapiro, has constructed a system that favors their interests over those of the general populace, leading to widespread disillusionment.

He critiques the notion that intelligence, as measured by standardized tests, is the sole determinant of success. Shapiro posits that this narrow definition of merit has contributed to a disconnect between the elite and the average American. He emphasizes that true meritocracy should encompass a broader range of qualities, including practical skills and social intelligence, rather than relying solely on academic achievements.

The Role of Technocracy

Shapiro contrasts meritocracy with technocracy, which he describes as a system governed by experts who believe they can engineer society for the better. He argues that this technocratic approach has led to a series of failures, as these elites often lack a genuine understanding of the needs and values of everyday Americans. Instead of allowing organic systems, such as free markets and community institutions, to flourish, technocrats impose their solutions, which often exacerbate existing problems.

He points out that the technocratic elite's attempts to manage society have resulted in a loss of trust among the populace. As people witness the failures of these imposed systems, they become increasingly skeptical of the motives and capabilities of those in power. This growing distrust has paved the way for outsider candidates who promise to disrupt the status quo and restore a sense of agency to the American people.

The Failures of the Democratic Party

Shapiro shifts his focus to the Democratic Party, highlighting what he perceives as a crisis of identity and purpose. He argues that the party has strayed from its foundational principles and has become increasingly disconnected from the concerns of ordinary citizens. This disconnection is evident in the party's embrace of progressive ideologies that prioritize identity politics over substantive policy discussions.

He cites the rise of figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as a response to the Democratic Party's failures. Kennedy, an outsider with a controversial stance on various issues, represents a challenge to the established order. Shapiro suggests that the Democratic Party's inability to adapt to the changing political landscape has left it vulnerable to challenges from unexpected sources.

The Reaction to Technocratic Failures

As Shapiro discusses the reaction to technocratic failures, he emphasizes the emergence of populist movements that seek to reclaim power for the average citizen. He argues that this backlash is a natural response to the elitist structures that have dominated American politics for decades. The rise of populist figures, including Donald Trump, reflects a desire for leaders who prioritize the needs of the people over the interests of a disconnected elite.

Shapiro notes that this populist wave is not limited to one political party; it transcends traditional party lines. Voters are increasingly drawn to candidates who promise to challenge the established order and address the issues that matter most to them. This shift signals a fundamental change in the political landscape, as the electorate seeks to reclaim its voice.

The Collapse of Institutional Trust

A significant theme in Shapiro's discussion is the collapse of trust in institutions. He argues that the failures of technocratic elites have eroded public confidence in government, media, and other traditional institutions. As people witness the consequences of misguided policies and decisions made by those in power, they become disillusioned and skeptical of the motives behind these actions.

Shapiro highlights the role of social media in amplifying this distrust. The rise of alternative media platforms has allowed individuals to bypass traditional gatekeepers and seek out information that aligns with their perspectives. This shift has contributed to a fragmented media landscape, where competing narratives coexist, further complicating the public's ability to discern truth from misinformation.

The Rise of Outsider Candidates

Shapiro discusses the increasing popularity of outsider candidates in American politics, emphasizing that this trend is a direct response to the failures of the established elite. Figures like Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have gained traction by positioning themselves as alternatives to the traditional political class. Their appeal lies in their willingness to challenge the status quo and address the concerns of everyday Americans.

He argues that this shift represents a fundamental change in the political landscape, as voters seek leaders who prioritize their needs over the interests of a disconnected elite. The rise of outsider candidates signals a growing desire for authenticity and accountability in politics, as the electorate becomes increasingly frustrated with the failures of established institutions.

The Disconnect Between Elites and the Public

Shapiro emphasizes the growing disconnect between the elite and the general public, arguing that this divide has significant implications for the future of American democracy. He contends that the self-appointed elite have created a moral framework that is out of touch with the values and concerns of ordinary citizens. This disconnect has fueled resentment and anger among the populace, leading to a demand for change.

He points out that this disconnect is not limited to political elites; it extends to cultural institutions as well. The media, academia, and other influential sectors have increasingly embraced progressive ideologies that alienate large segments of the population. As a result, many Americans feel marginalized and unheard, further exacerbating the divide between the elite and the public.

The Impact of Progressive Ideologies

Shapiro critiques the impact of progressive ideologies on American society, arguing that they have contributed to the erosion of traditional values and institutions. He contends that the embrace of identity politics and social justice initiatives has led to a culture of division and resentment. Instead of fostering unity and understanding, these ideologies have created an environment where individuals are pitted against one another based on their identities.

He emphasizes that this cultural shift has significant implications for the future of American democracy. As people become increasingly entrenched in their ideological positions, the possibility of meaningful dialogue and compromise diminishes. This polarization threatens the very fabric of society, as individuals retreat into echo chambers that reinforce their beliefs.

The Role of Free Markets

In discussing the role of free markets, Shapiro argues that they represent a natural outgrowth of individual merit and productivity. He contends that free markets incentivize innovation and creativity, allowing individuals to thrive based on their abilities rather than their connections to the elite. This dynamic stands in stark contrast to the technocratic systems that have dominated American governance in recent decades.

Shapiro emphasizes that a return to free market principles could help restore a sense of agency and empowerment among the populace. By allowing individuals to pursue their interests and talents without interference from a bureaucratic elite, society can foster an environment where merit truly matters. This shift could pave the way for a more equitable and prosperous future.

The Future of American Politics

As Shapiro concludes his discussion, he reflects on the future of American politics in light of the current trends. He suggests that the collapse of elitist structures may lead to a more dynamic and responsive political landscape. The rise of outsider candidates and the growing demand for accountability signal a shift toward a more participatory form of governance.

He emphasizes that this transformation will require a reevaluation of the values and priorities that underpin American society. As the electorate seeks to reclaim its voice, it is essential for leaders to listen to the concerns of their constituents and prioritize the needs of the people over the interests of a disconnected elite. This shift could ultimately lead to a more vibrant and inclusive democracy.