Kamala FINALLY Agrees to Interview…Pre-Taped, With A Babysitter

Added: Aug 29, 2024

The Race Between Harris and Trump

Despite the media's portrayal of Harris as a frontrunner following the Democratic National Convention (DNC), Shapiro argues that the race is actually a dead heat between her and former President Donald Trump. Polls indicate that Harris and Trump are statistically tied, with Harris leading by a slim margin that falls within the margin of error. Shapiro criticizes the media for emphasizing Democratic optimism while downplaying the reality of Harris's unpopularity and lack of significant bounce from the DNC.

Harris's Struggling Campaign

The discussion highlights Harris's favorability ratings, which remain low, particularly among independents. Shapiro points out that despite extensive media coverage and the star power of figures like Barack and Michelle Obama at the DNC, Harris's numbers have not improved significantly. He emphasizes that the media's narrative is designed to create the illusion of a decisive race, while in reality, Harris's campaign is struggling.

The Upcoming Interview

The podcast also addresses Harris's upcoming interview on CNN, which is set to be a joint appearance with Minnesota Governor Tim Walz. Shapiro expresses skepticism about the format, noting that it is pre-taped and not a solo interview, which raises questions about Harris's ability to handle tough questions on her own. He argues that the presence of Walz serves as a "babysitter" for Harris, suggesting that she may not be capable of effectively addressing challenging topics without assistance. The choice of Dana Bash as the interviewer is also critiqued, as Shapiro believes she is not an objective journalist and may not press Harris on critical issues.

Harris's Policy Position Inconsistencies

Shapiro outlines several key topics that Harris should be prepared to discuss, including her shifting positions on various policies such as fracking, healthcare, and immigration. The podcast highlights the inconsistency in Harris's stances, particularly her previous support for abolishing private health insurance and her recent opposition to electric vehicle mandates. Shapiro argues that these flip-flops need to be addressed directly in the interview, questioning whether Harris will provide satisfactory explanations for her changes in position.

The Democratic Strategy

The conversation shifts to the broader Democratic strategy, particularly in light of the upcoming election. Shapiro points out that the Democrats are attempting to manipulate the electoral process by keeping candidates like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on the ballot, even after he has suspended his campaign and endorsed Trump. This tactic is seen as an effort to siphon votes away from Trump while simultaneously trying to disqualify other candidates like Cornell West, who pose a potential threat to Harris's campaign.

Shapiro emphasizes the hypocrisy of the Democrats, who claim to champion democracy while actively working to undermine it. The discussion touches on the manipulation of social media platforms and the pressure exerted on companies like Meta to censor content that does not align with Democratic narratives. Shapiro argues that this reflects a broader trend of the left seeking to control the dissemination of information and stifle dissenting voices.

Legal Challenges and Election Integrity

As the podcast progresses, Shapiro discusses the legal challenges facing Trump, particularly the new charges filed by Special Counsel Jack Smith. Shapiro expresses concern that these legal battles could impact the election, especially if Trump is sentenced to jail time during the campaign. He suggests that the timing of these charges appears politically motivated, aimed at undermining Trump's candidacy.

Debate Dynamics and Democratic Manipulation

The conversation also touches on the implications of the upcoming debates, with Trump expressing frustration over the terms set by the Democrats. Shapiro notes that the Democrats are attempting to change the rules to their advantage, reflecting a broader pattern of manipulation in the electoral process. He argues that the Democrats are not genuinely committed to democratic principles, as evidenced by their actions to control the narrative and the candidates in the race.