Mike Benz: How NGOs Have Dominated the World, Who’s Behind Them, & How They’re Now Undermining Trump

The Origins of NGOs

Benz begins by tracing the origins of NGOs, highlighting their emergence in the early 20th century, particularly after the establishment of the U.S. income tax in 1913. This tax framework allowed for the creation of tax-deductible charitable organizations, which laid the groundwork for the proliferation of NGOs. He notes that these organizations were initially intended to provide humanitarian aid and support democratic movements worldwide. However, over time, they have evolved into powerful entities that often operate in tandem with government interests, particularly in the context of U.S. foreign policy.

The transformation of NGOs into instruments of statecraft became particularly pronounced during the Cold War. Benz explains how the U.S. government utilized NGOs to counter the spread of communism by funding various initiatives aimed at promoting democracy and capitalism in vulnerable regions. This strategy not only facilitated the expansion of American influence but also established a precedent for the use of NGOs as tools for geopolitical maneuvering. As a result, the line between governmental and non-governmental actions began to blur, leading to the complex landscape we see today.

The Role of the U.S. Institute of Peace

One of the key organizations Benz discusses is the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP), which he likens to the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). He critiques the naming conventions of these organizations, suggesting that they often misrepresent their true functions. For instance, while the USIP is ostensibly dedicated to promoting peace, Benz argues that its activities often undermine genuine peace efforts by supporting interventions that align with U.S. interests.

Benz elaborates on the USIP's involvement in various international conflicts, emphasizing its role in shaping narratives and influencing policy decisions. He points out that the USIP has been instrumental in facilitating U.S. government actions in conflict zones, often acting as a backchannel for diplomacy. This dual role raises questions about the integrity of peace initiatives and the extent to which they serve the interests of the American state rather than the populations they purport to help.

The Influence of George Soros

The discussion shifts to the influence of billionaire philanthropist George Soros and his Open Society Foundations. Benz argues that Soros's financial contributions to various NGOs have allowed him to exert significant control over political narratives and policy directions in multiple countries. He highlights how Soros's foundations have been involved in funding movements that align with U.S. foreign policy objectives, particularly in Eastern Europe and beyond.

Benz also critiques the perception of Soros as a benevolent figure, suggesting that his actions often prioritize profit over genuine humanitarian concerns. He cites examples of how Soros's financial interests have intersected with his philanthropic endeavors, leading to situations where the outcomes of his funded initiatives disproportionately benefit his business ventures. This intertwining of philanthropy and profit raises ethical questions about the motivations behind such funding and its implications for democracy.

The NGO-Plex and Its Impact on Democracy

Benz introduces the concept of the "NGO-Plex," a term he uses to describe the interconnected web of NGOs, government agencies, and private interests that collaborate to shape policy and public opinion. He argues that this network has become a powerful force in undermining democratic processes, particularly in the United States. By leveraging their influence, these organizations can manipulate public discourse and stifle dissenting voices, effectively creating an environment where alternative viewpoints are marginalized.

The implications of the NGO-Plex extend beyond foreign policy; Benz asserts that it poses a direct threat to American democracy itself. He points out that the concentration of power within this network allows for the manipulation of electoral processes and the suppression of populist movements. As a result, the very foundations of democracy are at risk, as citizens find themselves increasingly disconnected from the political process and unable to effect meaningful change.

The Role of the Blob

Benz discusses the term "the Blob," which refers to the entrenched foreign policy establishment in Washington, D.C. He explains that this group comprises various actors, including government officials, think tanks, and NGOs, all of whom share a common interest in maintaining the status quo. The Blob's influence is particularly pronounced in shaping U.S. foreign policy, often prioritizing the interests of multinational corporations over those of ordinary citizens.

The Blob's resistance to populist movements, such as the Trump administration, is a central theme in Benz's analysis. He argues that the establishment's fear of losing control over foreign policy has led to concerted efforts to undermine populist leaders who challenge their authority. This dynamic creates a hostile environment for those seeking to implement significant changes, as the Blob mobilizes its resources to maintain its grip on power.

The Use of NGOs in Regime Change

Benz provides several historical examples of how NGOs have been utilized as instruments of regime change. He highlights the role of the National Endowment for Democracy in orchestrating political upheavals in various countries, often under the guise of promoting democracy. This practice raises ethical concerns about the legitimacy of such interventions and the consequences they have for the affected populations.

The discussion of regime change leads Benz to examine the implications of these actions for U.S. foreign policy. He argues that the use of NGOs to facilitate regime change often results in unintended consequences, including destabilization and violence. As a result, the very goals these organizations claim to support—such as democracy and human rights—are frequently undermined by the methods employed to achieve them.

The Impact on Populism

Benz emphasizes the challenges faced by populist movements in the current political landscape, particularly in light of the NGO-Plex's influence. He argues that the establishment's efforts to suppress populist voices are driven by a desire to maintain control over the political narrative and prevent any significant shifts in power dynamics. This creates a hostile environment for populist leaders, who often find themselves at odds with entrenched interests.

The implications of this dynamic extend beyond individual political figures; Benz suggests that the broader populist movement is at risk of being co-opted or undermined by the very forces that claim to support it. As NGOs continue to shape public discourse and influence policy decisions, the potential for genuine populist change diminishes, leaving citizens disillusioned and disconnected from the political process.

The Future of NGOs and U.S. Foreign Policy

Looking ahead, Benz expresses concern about the future of NGOs and their role in U.S. foreign policy. He argues that the current trajectory suggests a continued entrenchment of the NGO-Plex, with little accountability for their actions. This raises questions about the legitimacy of U.S. interventions abroad and the extent to which they genuinely serve the interests of the populations they claim to help.

Benz also highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability within the NGO sector. He advocates for reforms that would ensure these organizations operate in a manner consistent with democratic principles and prioritize the needs of the communities they serve. Without such changes, the potential for NGOs to contribute positively to global governance remains limited, and their influence may continue to undermine democratic processes both domestically and internationally.

The Challenge of Reform

Benz acknowledges the difficulty of reforming the NGO sector, given the entrenched interests and power dynamics at play. He emphasizes that any meaningful change will require a concerted effort from both citizens and policymakers to challenge the status quo and demand greater accountability from these organizations. This may involve re-evaluating funding mechanisms, increasing transparency, and fostering a more inclusive political discourse.

The challenge of reform is compounded by the fact that many citizens remain unaware of the extent to which NGOs influence their lives and the political landscape. Benz argues that raising awareness about these issues is crucial for empowering individuals to advocate for change and hold both NGOs and government entities accountable. By fostering a more informed citizenry, it may be possible to create a political environment that prioritizes democratic values and genuine representation.