Curt Mills: Trump Can Save America or Wage Another War, but He Can’t Do Both. Here’s Why.

The Legacy of the Iraq War

Mills begins by reflecting on the architects of the Iraq War, noting that despite their significant influence, they have not regained full control over American foreign policy. He highlights the irony that even two months after Trump's decisive victory, these neoconservatives continue to attempt to undermine his administration, particularly during the confirmation hearings of key officials like Secretary of Defense Mark Heth. Mills suggests that Heth's personnel choices indicate a potential shift away from the neoconservative agenda, hinting at a more pragmatic approach to foreign policy.

The Pentagon's Bureaucratic Challenges

The discussion shifts to the Pentagon's bureaucratic nature, characterized by its resistance to change and a tendency to prioritize its own interests. Mills argues that the Pentagon's historical record of military engagements has been dismal, with a focus on spending rather than winning wars. He posits that Heth's early personnel decisions signal a departure from the conventional wisdom that has dominated U.S. foreign policy for decades.

The Role of New Personnel

Mills introduces key figures in Heth's team, such as Michael Domino and Daniel Caldwell, both of whom have military backgrounds and a desire to move away from the endless cycle of conflict. He emphasizes that these individuals are aligned with Trump's vision of reducing American military involvement abroad, a sentiment that resonates with a growing segment of the American public, particularly younger conservatives who are increasingly skeptical of foreign wars.

The Media's Influence and Disinformation

The conversation also addresses the role of the media in shaping public perception of foreign policy. Mills criticizes outlets like Jewish Insider and reporters such as Jennifer Griffin for perpetuating disinformation campaigns against individuals like Domino and Caldwell. He argues that these attacks are often devoid of context and serve to silence dissenting voices within the foreign policy establishment. Mills expresses concern that this environment stifles honest debate and leads to a lack of accountability for those advocating for military interventions.

The Dangers of War with Iran

As the discussion progresses, Mills raises the specter of a potential conflict with Iran, framing it as a significant risk for the incoming Trump administration. He notes that the neoconservative agenda often positions Iran as the "head of the snake," a narrative that has been used to justify military action. Mills argues that the American public has not been adequately informed about the implications of such a conflict, particularly in light of the ongoing opioid crisis fueled by drugs originating from China, which has claimed far more American lives than Iranian proxies ever could.

The Shift in Public Sentiment

Mills observes a shift in public sentiment, particularly among evangelical Christians, who have historically supported military interventions. He argues that many are beginning to question the moral justification for such actions, recognizing that their faith does not condone violence. This evolving perspective could pose a challenge to the neoconservative agenda, which has relied on these groups for support.

The Importance of Domestic Focus

Throughout the conversation, Mills emphasizes the need for the United States to refocus its priorities on domestic issues rather than engaging in foreign conflicts. He argues that the country is at a critical juncture, with pressing challenges such as border security and economic stability requiring immediate attention. Mills contends that Trump has the opportunity to address these issues effectively, but only if he resists the pressure to engage in another war.

The Role of the New Administration

Mills expresses optimism about the potential for the new administration to chart a different course in foreign policy. He believes that Trump can leverage his outsider status to challenge the entrenched interests that have dominated Washington for years. By surrounding himself with individuals who share his vision of a more restrained foreign policy, Trump could redefine America's role on the global stage.