Candace Owens: Macron, Harvey Weinstein, and Why “Christ Is King” Totally Broke People’s Brains

The incident led Owens to question the veracity of historical narratives, pondering whether major diplomatic outcomes might hinge on seemingly trivial or hidden factors. She highlights the surreal nature of Macron's request, which was framed as a condition for peace talks, and notes that Trump appeared confused by the situation. Owens emphasizes that this episode exposed the true face of diplomacy—one that is often opaque and driven by personal interests rather than transparent statecraft. The story gained traction when Macron did not deny the call, and subsequently, Macron sued Owens, alleging defamation and other claims related to her podcast.

The Lawsuit and Media Harassment

Owens delves into the details of the lawsuit filed against her by Emmanuel Macron and his wife. The suit, spanning 200 pages, accuses her of defamation and cyberbullying, though Owens characterizes it as a poorly constructed public relations strategy rather than a genuine legal effort. She explains that the lawsuit attempts to conflate various claims, including allegations she never made, and is designed to intimidate and silence her. Owens points out the irony that Macron's team is suing her in the United States, where free speech protections are stronger, rather than in France, where they have already lost defamation cases.

The harassment extends beyond Owens to journalists like Xavier Bousard, who authored the book on which her podcast is based. Bousard was forced to relocate his family to Italy due to government pressure and surveillance, illustrating the authoritarian nature of Macron's regime. Owens highlights the aggressive tactics used by Macron's legal team, including hiring lawyers known for intimidating critics and attempting to stifle investigative journalism. She argues that the lawsuit has backfired, increasing public interest in the podcast and exposing the lengths to which powerful figures will go to suppress inconvenient truths.

The Mystery of Brigitte Macron's Identity

Central to Owens' investigation is the controversial claim that Brigitte Macron was born a man named Jean-Michel Trognau. Owens recounts how this allegation, initially dismissed as a far-right conspiracy, gained credibility through meticulous research and legal battles in France. She notes the absence of photographs or verifiable information about Brigitte's early life, which is unusual for a public figure and fuels suspicion. Owens also discusses the French government's aggressive legal actions against journalists and critics who probe Brigitte's past, including charges of invasion of privacy and defamation.

Owens stresses that neither Brigitte nor Emmanuel Macron has ever provided clear evidence to refute these claims, such as childhood photos or school records, despite multiple requests. She finds it telling that only one of Brigitte's adult children has publicly defended her, and even then, without providing substantive proof. Owens suggests that the Macron family's refusal to engage transparently with these allegations raises serious questions about their authenticity and motives. The story, she argues, is emblematic of a broader pattern of secrecy and control exercised by powerful elites.

The Macron Family's Alleged Pedophilia and Abuse Network

A disturbing theme emerges as Owens connects the Macron controversy to a wider network of alleged pedophilia and abuse involving close associates and political allies. She reveals that Emmanuel Macron's relationship with Brigitte began when he was just 14 years old and she was significantly older, a fact admitted in legal filings. Owens describes this as a form of child molestation, highlighting the audacity of Macron's team to include this detail in their lawsuit while simultaneously suing her for defamation.

Owens further exposes a web of individuals connected to the Macron circle who have been implicated in sexual abuse scandals, including a finance minister known for defending incestuous relationships in court. She paints a grim picture of a depraved elite class that wields power with impunity, protected by a complicit media and legal system. Owens argues that this network's influence extends beyond France, touching on global institutions and intelligence agencies, and that exposing it is crucial for justice and societal health.

The Role of French Intelligence and Media Control

Owens highlights the formidable power of French intelligence services, which she describes as among the most competent and feared in the world. She explains that these agencies actively monitor and intimidate journalists and critics investigating the Macron family, contributing to a climate of fear and censorship. Owens recounts how Xavier Bousard and others faced surveillance and legal harassment, forcing them to flee France to continue their work safely.

The media's role in shaping public perception is also scrutinized. Owens criticizes mainstream outlets for dismissing the Macron allegations as conspiracy theories without thorough investigation. She contrasts this with the aggressive legal and intelligence tactics used to suppress dissent, suggesting a coordinated effort to maintain a sanitized public image of the Macron presidency. Owens argues that this dynamic reveals the deep entanglement of state power, intelligence, and media in controlling narratives and silencing opposition.

The Psychological and Spiritual Dimensions

Owens explores the psychological underpinnings of the gaslighting and deception she encounters, drawing on the legacy of Sigmund Freud and psychoanalytic theory. She discusses how Freud's work, influenced by Jewish mystical traditions like the Kabbalah, contributed to mainstreaming gaslighting as a social and psychological tool. Owens references books by Jewish scholars who reveal Freud's complicity in covering up child abuse and promoting harmful narratives that blame victims.

This leads Owens to a broader spiritual analysis, where she sees the current cultural and political battles as part of a cosmic struggle between truth and deception. She argues that the elites' use of gaslighting and propaganda is not merely political but deeply spiritual, aimed at undermining moral clarity and promoting nihilism. Owens calls for a return to principled living grounded in faith and truth, warning that succumbing to fear and falsehood only empowers malevolent forces.

The Nick Fuentes Interview and the Culture of Deception

Owens recounts her experience interviewing Nick Fuentes, a controversial figure known for his provocative rhetoric. She describes the interview as initially cordial and open, with Fuentes sharing his background and views. However, after the interview was recorded but before it aired, Fuentes dramatically reversed his stance, accusing Owens of betrayal and setting him up. Owens interprets this behavior as either insecurity or a calculated performance designed to manipulate his audience.

She further critiques Fuentes for targeting sincere critics of neoconservative foreign policy, such as Joe Kent and Dave Smith, undermining credible voices on the right. Owens suggests that Fuentes' actions serve to discredit legitimate dissent and maintain division within conservative circles. She compares his tactics to those of David Duke, who similarly sought to delegitimize mainstream conservatives by association. Owens concludes that Fuentes' duplicity reflects a broader pattern of deception in political discourse.

The Harvey Weinstein Interview and the MeToo Movement

Owens discusses her surprising decision to interview Harvey Weinstein while he was in prison, motivated by a desire to explore the complexities of the MeToo movement and the legal cases against him. She was struck by Weinstein's candidness and his continued support for organizations like the ADL, despite his incarceration. Owens challenges the prevailing narrative that Weinstein was unequivocally guilty of rape, pointing to inconsistencies in the cases and the behavior of accusers post-allegation.

She critiques the MeToo movement for its tendency toward mob justice and the erosion of due process, highlighting cases like Matt Lauer's where allegations led to career destruction without clear evidence. Owens expresses concern about the impact of such movements on men's lives, including her own sons, emphasizing the need for fairness and truth. Her interview with Weinstein aims to shed light on these nuances and question the media's role in shaping public opinion.

The Michael Jackson Case and Media Manipulation

Owens revisits the Michael Jackson child abuse allegations, sharing her journey from initial belief in his guilt to skepticism after reviewing the evidence. She points out that Jackson was embroiled in a battle over publishing rights with Sony, suggesting that the allegations may have been part of a broader campaign to undermine him. Owens notes that key figures who knew Jackson, including Macaulay Culkin, have defended him against abuse claims.

She criticizes the media for perpetuating a narrative that presumes guilt without sufficient proof, contributing to a culture where public opinion is shaped by sensationalism rather than facts. Owens warns that such media behavior damages the credibility of genuine victims and distorts justice. Her analysis underscores the importance of critical thinking and resisting simplistic narratives in high-profile cases.

The Corruption of Media and the Justin Baldoni Case

Owens examines the case of actor Justin Baldoni and actress Blake Lively, where Lively accused Baldoni of sexual harassment in a manner that Owens argues was exaggerated and misleading. She reveals that behind the scenes, Lively sought to leverage the accusation for professional gain, demanding producer credits on a film. Owens highlights how the New York Times and other media outlets amplified the allegations without presenting the full context, effectively participating in a character assassination.

This case exemplifies Owens' broader critique of the media as a tool for personal and political vendettas, rather than objective reporting. She stresses the devastating consequences for those targeted by such campaigns, noting that many do not survive the public backlash. Owens calls for greater journalistic integrity and accountability to prevent the weaponization of media against individuals.