ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT RIOTS! TRUMP SENDS IN THE TROOPS!

The Unfolding Crisis in Los Angeles

Shapiro begins by recounting his personal experiences in Los Angeles, highlighting the long-standing issues of illegal immigration in the area. He notes that many individuals crossing the border illegally often rely on public services, which places a burden on taxpayers. Shapiro emphasizes that while he sympathizes with those seeking a better life, the law must be enforced. He argues that the federal government has historically failed to uphold immigration laws, particularly under the Biden administration, which he claims has led to a surge in illegal crossings.

The situation escalated when federal agents conducted immigration enforcement operations in Los Angeles, leading to protests that turned violent. Shapiro describes how protesters surrounded federal buildings, assaulted ICE officers, and engaged in acts of vandalism. He expresses disbelief that such lawlessness could occur in response to the enforcement of immigration laws, suggesting that the protests reflect a broader disregard for the rule of law.

The Role of the National Guard

In response to the violence, President Trump activated the National Guard to restore order. Shapiro discusses the legal basis for this decision, referencing Title 10 of the U.S. Code, which allows the president to deploy the National Guard in situations of rebellion or civil unrest. He argues that the deployment is justified given the violent actions of the protesters, who he claims are not merely expressing dissent but are actively engaging in criminal behavior.

Shapiro contrasts the current situation with past instances where the National Guard was deployed, such as during the LA riots in 1992. He asserts that the federal government has a responsibility to protect its citizens and enforce the law, regardless of the political climate in a given state.

The Left's Response

The podcast also addresses the reaction from Democratic leaders, who have criticized Trump's decision to deploy the National Guard. Shapiro highlights statements from California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, who have framed the federal response as an overreach. He argues that their focus on protecting illegal immigrants over law enforcement reflects a broader trend within the Democratic Party, which he characterizes as increasingly radical and anti-law enforcement.

Shapiro points out that the left's narrative often portrays illegal immigrants as victims, while downplaying the impact of their actions on public safety. He expresses concern that this perspective undermines the rule of law and emboldens those who engage in violence against law enforcement.

The Broader Implications

As the discussion unfolds, Shapiro connects the riots in Los Angeles to a larger cultural and political battle in the United States. He argues that there is a growing divide between those who seek to uphold the rule of law and those who advocate for a more lenient approach to immigration. He suggests that the protests are indicative of a broader anti-establishment sentiment that seeks to dismantle existing institutions.

Shapiro also touches on the role of media in shaping public perception of these events. He criticizes outlets for framing the protests as primarily peaceful, despite the violence that has occurred. He argues that this narrative serves to normalize lawlessness and distract from the real issues at hand.

The Future of Immigration Policy

Looking ahead, Shapiro speculates on the potential ramifications of the current crisis for future immigration policy. He suggests that the ongoing unrest may lead to a reevaluation of how immigration laws are enforced and the political consequences for those who oppose such enforcement. He emphasizes the need for a clear and consistent approach to immigration that prioritizes the safety and security of American citizens.