COMMUNIST WINS NYC! Mamdani STUNS Cuomo In Mayoral Primary

The Rise of Zoran Mamdani and the New York City Mayoral Race

Shapiro opens with a vivid and critical portrayal of Mamdani, describing him as a “communist pro-jihadi insane person” whose victory signals a radical leftward turn in New York City politics. Mamdani’s platform, which includes proposals such as free bus service, publicly owned grocery stores, and full-scale nationalization of industries, is characterized by Shapiro as not only impractical but emblematic of the “Bernie Sandersization” of American society. He highlights Mamdani’s appeal to younger, predominantly white, college-educated voters who are drawn to his joyful rhetoric and radical promises, contrasting this with the more pragmatic and moderate voting patterns of Black and Hispanic communities in the city, who largely rejected Mamdani.

Shapiro underscores the irony that the wealthiest and most educated segments of New York’s population—those who arguably have the most to lose from socialist policies—were the primary drivers of Mamdani’s victory. He attributes this to the indoctrination prevalent in elite universities, which he believes have become breeding grounds for radical leftist ideology. The demographic and geographic voting patterns reveal a stark divide, with Mamdani’s support concentrated in the whitest and wealthiest neighborhoods, while other parts of the city leaned toward Cuomo or independent candidates like Eric Adams.

The former governor Cuomo’s swift concession, despite the ranked-choice voting system that often delays results, is interpreted by Shapiro as a sign of the Democratic Party’s internal crisis and the waning influence of establishment figures. Cuomo’s subsequent announcement of an independent run further complicates the mayoral race, potentially splitting the moderate vote and increasing Mamdani’s chances of winning the general election.

National Implications for the Democratic Party

Shapiro expands the discussion to the national stage, warning that Mamdani’s victory is a harbinger of the Democratic Party’s future direction. He argues that the party is increasingly dominated by radical left-wing figures like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), Ilhan Omar, and Rashida Tlaib, who have been embraced by party leadership despite representing a minority faction. This shift, he contends, alienates moderate and minority voters and risks handing the party over to ideological extremes.

He predicts that AOC is likely to be the Democratic presidential nominee in 2028 unless black voters in key states like South Carolina decisively oppose her candidacy, as they did with Bernie Sanders in 2020. Shapiro stresses that the party’s embrace of socialism and radical policies is not only politically risky but also threatens the economic and social fabric of cities like New York.

Shapiro also critiques the primary election process, suggesting that the elimination of “smoke-filled back rooms” has empowered the most radical elements within parties, leading to candidates like Mamdani rising to prominence. He laments that the Democratic Party has become hostage to a vocal and ideologically extreme minority that does not represent the broader electorate.

The Fallout from the Israel-Iran Conflict and Media Coverage

Transitioning to foreign affairs, Shapiro discusses the recent Israel-Iran conflict and President Trump’s decisive military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. He praises Trump for successfully orchestrating a ceasefire that is currently holding, despite ongoing provocations such as Iranian drone attacks on Israel. Shapiro dismisses media narratives suggesting a split within the Republican Party over Trump’s actions, citing polling data showing overwhelming Republican and MAGA support for the strikes.

He criticizes the legacy media for biased and inaccurate coverage, particularly their attempts to downplay the effectiveness of the strikes by leaking low-confidence intelligence assessments that claim the Iranian nuclear program was only set back by months. Shapiro counters these claims by highlighting expert analyses and satellite imagery indicating severe damage to Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, including the destruction of key facilities and the elimination of top nuclear scientists.

Shapiro also notes the geopolitical dynamics surrounding the conflict, pointing out that Russia and China have largely remained on the sidelines, unwilling or unable to intervene on Iran’s behalf. He interprets this as a vindication of the “peace through strength” doctrine, where demonstrating military resolve deters adversaries and prevents wider escalation.

Domestic Political Reactions and Media Leaks

The podcast delves into the domestic political fallout from the Iran strikes, focusing on the Democratic Party’s response. Shapiro highlights calls for President Trump’s impeachment from figures like AOC and Jasmine Crockett, whom he disparages for their lack of understanding of constitutional war powers and foreign policy. He contrasts their reactions with Trump’s own sharp rebukes, including his dismissive nicknames for his critics.

Shapiro accuses a faction within the Trump administration, particularly neoisolationists, of leaking intelligence assessments to the media in an effort to undermine the president’s foreign policy. He condemns these leaks as disloyal and politically motivated, aimed at weakening Trump’s standing and emboldening his opponents.

Additional Topics: Economic and Political Developments

Briefly, Shapiro touches on President Trump’s efforts at the NATO summit to compel European allies to increase their defense spending, praising the progress made toward a 5% GDP target. He also notes ongoing support for Ukraine from European countries, emphasizing the importance of a smooth transition from American to European military aid.

Shapiro closes by reflecting on the broader political and cultural shifts in America, lamenting the rise of radical left-wing ideology and its consequences for cities like New York. He offers a stark choice to productive and wealthy individuals in New York: either stay and endure the consequences of socialist policies or relocate to more business-friendly states like Florida, which he champions as a haven for innovation and prosperity.